The Educational Technology Site: ICT in Education
THE site for leaders and managers of educational ICT

Home Page 

Why not subscribe to our free newsletter? Click here for more info.


  Enter your email to receive
  the latest article summaries

 
  Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Update me when site is updated

Subscribe to article summaries

Subscribe to full articles

Subscribe to our podcast

Subscribe to Computers in Classrooms, our free newsletter

Latest news via Twitter

Latest comments on this site

Thoughts & tips for the day

Terry's 2 Minute Tips videos

Our latest del.icio.us bookmarks

My recent activity (via Friendfeed)

 
 News & Views
 
 Leading & Managing Educational Technology
 
 Website guides
 
 Using & Teaching Educational Technology
 Checklist: using ed tech
 
 Computers in Classrooms
 Latest + downloads
 Past issues
 
 Weekend

Locations of visitors to this page

Using & Teaching Educational Technology


Ten things to do when someone follows you in Twitter
By Terry Freedman
Created on Wed, 31 Dec 2008, 00:30

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Email the author
Listen to this article

twitter_profileIf someone follows you in Twitter, the polite thing to do is reciprocate, right? Well, maybe so, but I think it needs a little more thought than that. Here is a list of the steps I take when someone follows me.

Incidentally, the same techniques, with a bit of adjustment, work for any social network situation where people can become your "friend".

#1: What's in it for you?

As a general rule, I think about what I hope to gain from the relationship. Relationship? Yes: as soon as you follow someone, or they follow you, you have a relationship of sorts, whenever you want it or not and regardless of whether you pay it any attention. The only way to avoid it whilst remaining within your Twitter network is by blocking that person.

Now, my primary reason for wanting to link with anyone online is my interest in educational ICT. I have a secondary interest, that of business, because I run my own business. I am also interested in writing and journalism. And that is pretty much it. Unless you have the most amazing powers of persuasion, chances are that I won't be your friend or follower unless you come into one of those categories. Yes, there are the odd exceptions, such as connecting with someone who likes the same sort of music as I do, but even there it is almost certainly the case that I already "know" or know of the person through one of the other spheres I have just mentioned.

This is very much linked to my main website, of course. The focus of that is ICT in education. There may be a great, newsworthy article just begging to be written -- but if it's not to do with ICT in education it probably won't be me writing it, and if I do, it won't be on that website.

What it comes down to is this: I don't want to populate my Twitter network with people who have little or nothing to do with my main interests, because that will only make it more likely that I will miss something important from the people who do. That's why I don't agree with the people who advocate following as many people as possible: I think one needs to be more discriminating than that.

In summary: decide in advance what sort of people you're happy to follow, ie the ones from whom you're likely to benefit from following.

That's the backdrop against which I take all of the steps that follow.

#2: Check the tweets

When I receive an email to say that someone is following me, I click on the link to their Twitter page. I then check look to see what they've been tweeting about. If it's mainly technology or education-related, that's a good start.

If it's about what they had for breakfast over the last week and a half, that's a real turn-off but not a "deal-breaker".

If their tweets are all along the lines of "Great investment opportunity: make $5,000 a week for 5 minutes' work", I will block them straight away.

If they haven't tweeted yet, go straight to #5.

#3: Check the numbers

The next thing I do is check how many people they follow, and who follow them. If they have 3 followers and are following 5,000 people, I probably won't follow them. I would just assume that they're a sort of Twitter groupie and are following everyone in sight. I like to think that they want to follow me because they like what I write about, not to boost their numbers. But I won't dismiss them just yet -- you can't say I'm not fair!

If they have 5,000 followers and follow nobody, that seems on the face of it a bit egotistical and a bit pointless. But I still won't dismiss them just yet!

If they follow 5,000 people and have 5,000 followers, they're probably some sort of spammer. I almost certainly won't follow them. In fact, I may even block them, because this sort of thing usually goes hand-in-hand with the third type of tweet mentioned in #2.

#4: Who's who?

I like to check who the followers are, and who the followees (is there such a word?) are. If I recognise some names I respect, I'm usually happy to set aside my doubts for a while.

#5: Check their profile

If it is blank, or says that they're a professional goof-offer, or that they manage a real estate company and enjoy engineering in their spare time, I won't follow them. I have nothing against real estate workers or engineers, but I don't see what any of that has to do with me. See #1.

#6: Check if they have a website

If they don't, I almost certainly won't follow them unless I'm reasonably satisfied according to points 2, 3, 4 and 5. The existence of a website tells me they're (probably) serious. It also gives me a chance to find out more about them.

#7: Look at their website URL

If they have a website, but it's URL is www.goofingoff.com, I won't follow them. If it's some generic website that I can't check, like www.blogger.com, I won't follow them.

#8: Check their website

If we've made it this far, I'll check their website. In other words, unless I have been totally put off according to some of the earlier criteria, and if they do have a genuine-sounding website, I will look at it. If it's interesting then I will probably bookmark it or subscribe to its RSS feed even if I don't wish to follow them in Twitter (just yet).

#9: Check their profile or About page

If they have a website, I'll try and find out a little more about them there as well. Bottom line: are they who they purport to be, or some sort of scam artist or pornbroker (no, that wasn't a spelling error)?

#10: Home at last!

If all the previous nine hoops have been jumped through satisfactorily, I click on "Follow"!

Conclusion

I suppose all of that makes me sound like some sort of prima donna or intellectual snob, or as if I'm paranoid. I'm not, though I suppose you'll have to take my word for it. But if you think about it, these 10 steps are not a bad blueprint for how students should evaluate requests for online friendship. And although it all seems like a long and drawn out process, the whole thing from start to finish takes me 5 minutes at the outside. The reason I often keep people waiting for a response when they follow me is not that the process takes a long time, but because I usually end up trying to process lots of "follows" in one go, a couple of months after receiving the notification. (But I'm trying to improve in that department!)

I'd be interested to hear what you think of these steps, and how you respond when people follow you in Twitter or other social networks. Use the Comment link below or email me using the link at the top of this article.

Related articles:

Three microblogging services for use in schools

Six microblogging services that may be of interest to educators



What do you think? Please leave a comment.

© Terry Freedman Wed, 31 Dec 2008


Comments are moderated.
If you found this article useful,  share it with a colleague via email. You can also share it on other websites using the "Share or Retweet" button below
Headlines by category
Latest articles by category


News & Views
The tyranny of relevance
My views on blogging
The Tech Force
Independent Review of ICT User Skills
Some pros and cons of online textbooks
Just because it’s old, doesn’t mean it’s useless!
What if the Home Access initiative were a food relief programme?
Subtlety and nuance
Attention all games creators in the UK!
Computers in Classrooms: Back to School Issue just published
Leading & Managing Educational Technology
Risk Assessment
Making ICT more interesting: 5 suggestions
Seven reasons to have an educational technology library in school
But where are the kids?
Increasing the decision-making capacity of your team
Decision-making in a crisis
Decision-making in a complex environment
Shock Tactics
Conventional non-wisdom
Briefing for 18 September 2008
Website guides
Website menu guide
Guide to the Educational Technology: ICT in Education Website
QuickStart Guide to the Educational Technology: I.C.T. in Education Site
Website Guide: Getting Content for Your Website
Using & Teaching Educational Technology
Teachers as bloggers
Terry's Two Minute Tips #13: Effective Feedback
Ask Miller! Final edition!
Ask Miller!
Review of 31 Days to Build a Better Blog
Who needs educational technology shows?
Why can’t assessment be like feedback in eBay?
Are you only teaching the kids how to drill holes?
Could do better: 4 ‘malfunctions’ in ICT the provision of England and Wales
How do we make most schools e-enabled?
Computers in Classrooms
ICT in the Rose Review of the Primary Curriculum: Wordle and PDF Version
Announcement: Briefing on ICT in the Rose Review of the Primary Curriculum
Computers in Classrooms Social Networking Special
Computers in Classrooms Mid-April 2009 Issue
Computers in Classrooms 3 April 2009
Computers in Classrooms: Talking Books, Book reviews, Visualisers, Report on the Primary Capital 08 Conference and much, much more
Computers in Classrooms March 2009: hardware and book reviews, advice on school design and bidding for capital funding and much more!
Newsletter changes
Computers in Classrooms 09 February 2009: Safer Internet Day
Newsletter news: a call for volunteers for a trial plus forthcoming articles
Weekend
Blast from the past: what was I concerned about on this date in last year?
Change management #5: People can do it for themselves
Change Management #4
Change management #3
Change Management #2
Change management #1